14 Oct TERRORISM: Its new genres and further challenges [GS II, International Relations]
CONTEXT: Two decades after September 11, 2001, when al-Qaeda attacked over American soil, resulting into US invasion of Afghanistan. The developments now in the same series are in the form of the return of the Taliban in Afghanistan.
The question arises whether the Global war on terror was a failure?
Are there lessons to be learnt from it?
BACKGROUND PERCEPTIONS:-
The 9/11 attacks were the aggregate of a series of systemic and structural shortcomings of the U.S. security establishment along with the failure of human imagination.
A/c Historians, Osama bin Laden’s actions were motivated by geopolitical and religious objectives, and his obsession with the ‘sufferings of Muslims’ in many far-flung regions.
He wanted to force the U.S. to alter its policies in areas of conflict, by such attacks. However, he failed and al-qaeda faced the consequences.
Laden’s goal to destroy the ‘myth of American invincibility’ failed and the Global war on terror neutralised the fears that terrorism was assured to create large-scale chaos across the globe.
Reasons for bin Laden’s failure:-
-
Laden and other leaders, all lacked the centrality of vision or power essential to sustain the momentum of such initiatives.
-
Initially Afghanistan and Pakistan provided safe havens, and the situation changed once the safe havens were no longer available.
-
The lack of visibility of the leaders and their diminishing authority over time contributed to the disappearance of the terror momentum and the capacity for militancy and violence.
Challenge continues:-
Two decades have passed since of the Global war on terror is continued, however it did not eradicate terrorism.
Terror groups such as al-Qaeda and the IS today pose a persistent challenge. Even after:-
-
Leadership losses
-
Organisational fracturing
-
Territorial degradation
-
Hard intelligence on the myriad terror modules
-
The absence of a single core for either al- Qaeda or the IS
CHANGING NATURE OF ATTACKS:-
It would be tempting for intelligence agencies to think that the current low attacks shows the weakening of terror modules, including that of al-Qaeda and the IS , including –
-
low-tech attacks
-
small arms attacks
-
the occasional use of Improvised Explosive Devices
-
random ‘lone wolf’ attacks
.The Terrorism, stemming from a mixture of religious fervour and fundamentalist aims, remains vibrant.
The newer breed of terrorists, though less familiar with teachings of the Egyptian, Sayyid Qutb or the Palestinian, Abdullah Azzam, but they are well-versed in the practical methodologies practised by:
-
Jalaluddin and Sirajuddin Haqqanis (the latter is a Minister in the Interim Afghan Government),
-
Hafiz Saeed of the Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT) and
-
Maulana Masood Azhar of the Jaish-e-Mohammed (JeM), etc.
No Comments