31 Jul Prevention of Insults to National Honour (Amendment) Bill, 2026: Inclusion of ‘Vande Mataram’

Why in News?

Parliament has passed the Prevention of Insults to National Honour (Amendment) Bill, 2026, extending criminal penalties to insults against ‘Vande Mataram’, India’s National Song, by placing it on par with the National Anthem under the Prevention of Insults to National Honour Act, 1971.

---

Background

Prevention of Insults to National Honour Act, 1971

• Enacted to protect the dignity of India’s:
  • National Flag.
  • National Anthem.
  • Constitution of India.
• Provides penalties for intentional acts of disrespect towards these national symbols.
• The 2026 Amendment expands the scope of the Act to include ‘Vande Mataram’.

---

Key Provisions of the Amendment Bill, 2026

1. Inclusion of ‘Vande Mataram’

• Makes intentional insults to ‘Vande Mataram’ a punishable offence.
• Places the National Song on a similar legal footing as the National Anthem regarding criminal penalties.

---

2. Punishment

• Prescribes imprisonment of up to three years, fine, or both for acts considered insulting to the National Song.

---

3. Expanded Scope of Criminal Liability

• Broadens the list of protected national symbols under the Act.
• Increases the scope of offences that may attract criminal prosecution.

---

Arguments in Favour of the Amendment

Promoting National Unity

• Seeks to reinforce respect for national symbols.
• Aims to strengthen patriotic values and national identity.

---

Protection of National Heritage

• Recognises the historical importance of ‘Vande Mataram’ in India’s freedom struggle.
• Provides statutory protection against deliberate acts of disrespect.

---

Deterrence

• Intended to discourage intentional insults to symbols associated with national unity and sovereignty.

---

Concerns and Criticisms

1. Risk of Over-Criminalisation

• Critics argue that the amendment criminalises conduct where very few offences have been reported.
• Raises concerns about expanding criminal law without clear necessity.

---

2. Possibility of Misuse

• Broad or ambiguous interpretation of “insult” could lead to arbitrary prosecutions.
• May be used against political dissent or artistic expression if safeguards are inadequate.

---

3. Burden on Criminal Justice System

• Existing data indicate relatively few convictions under the 1971 Act compared to arrests.
• Additional offences could further burden investigation agencies and courts.

---

4. Impact on Freedom of Expression

• The amendment may invite debate regarding the balance between:
  • Respect for national symbols.
  • Freedom of speech and expression under Article 19(1)(a).

---

Constitutional Perspective

Fundamental Duty

Article 51A(a)

It is the duty of every citizen:

“To abide by the Constitution and respect its ideals and institutions, the National Flag and the National Anthem.”

Although ‘Vande Mataram’ is not specifically mentioned in Article 51A(a), the amendment seeks to extend statutory protection to the National Song.

---

Freedom of Speech

Article 19(1)(a)

• Guarantees freedom of speech and expression.
• Subject to reasonable restrictions under Article 19(2).

The amendment may lead to judicial scrutiny on whether restrictions imposed are reasonable and proportionate.

---

Important Judicial Decisions

Bijoe Emmanuel v. State of Kerala (1986)

• The Supreme Court held that students belonging to the Jehovah’s Witnesses faith could not be compelled to sing the National Anthem if they respectfully stood during its rendition.
• The judgment affirmed that respect for national symbols cannot override constitutionally protected freedoms of conscience and expression.

---

Challenges

• Defining what constitutes an “insult.”
• Preventing arbitrary or selective enforcement.
• Balancing patriotism with constitutional liberties.
• Ensuring proportionality in criminal law.

---

Way Forward

1. Clearly define the scope of punishable acts to prevent ambiguity.
2. Ensure safeguards against misuse through judicial oversight.
3. Promote civic education and constitutional values rather than relying solely on criminal sanctions.
4. Maintain a balance between respect for national symbols and protection of fundamental rights.
5. Encourage voluntary patriotism consistent with constitutional principles.

---

Constitutional & Legal Framework

---

Significance for UPSC

• Relevant for GS Paper II (Polity & Constitution).
• Covers themes of:
  • Fundamental Rights.
  • Fundamental Duties.
  • Criminal law reforms.
  • Constitutional morality.
  • Freedom of expression versus national symbols.

---

UPSC Prelims Practice Question

Q. With reference to the Prevention of Insults to National Honour Act, consider the following statements:

1. The Prevention of Insults to National Honour Act was enacted in 1971.
2. The Prevention of Insults to National Honour (Amendment) Bill, 2026 extends statutory protection to ‘Vande Mataram’.
3. Article 51A(a) of the Constitution explicitly mentions ‘Vande Mataram’ as a national symbol that citizens must respect.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

(a) 1 and 2 only
(b) 2 and 3 only
(c) 1 and 3 only
(d) 1, 2 and 3

Answer: (a)

Explanation:

• Statement 1 is correct: The Act was enacted in 1971.
• Statement 2 is correct: The 2026 Amendment extends legal protection to ‘Vande Mataram’.
• Statement 3 is incorrect: Article 51A(a) specifically mentions the Constitution, National Flag, and National Anthem, but not ‘Vande Mataram’.