08 Aug Centre releases ₹2,597 crore to Kerala as additional tax devolution instalment
Union Finance MinistryTax devolutionCapital expenditureFiscal federalismFinance Commission✎ Tax devolution under Article 270 is a constitutional transfer of Union tax revenue to states, determined by the Finance Commission, and forms the bedrock of cooperative federalism in India.
Subject Relevance — Where This Topic Fits
- GS Paper II — Functions and Responsibilities of the Union and the States, Issues and Challenges Pertaining to the Federal Structure, Devolution of Powers and Finances up to Local Levels | GS Paper III — Indian Economy and issues relating to Planning, Mobilisation of Resources, Growth, Development and Employment
- Prelims: Article 270 of the Constitution, Finance Commission, Tax Devolution, Gross Tax Revenue, Union-State fiscal transfers, Capital Expenditure, Revenue Deficit, Fiscal Federalism
- Essay: Fiscal Federalism in India: Balancing Autonomy and Equity, Cooperative Federalism: A Necessity for Inclusive Growth
Quick Revision: Tax devolution under Article 270 is a constitutional transfer of Union tax revenue to states, determined by the Finance Commission, and forms the bedrock of cooperative federalism in India.
Why is this in the news?
The Union Finance Ministry’s release of ₹2,597 crore as an additional instalment of tax devolution to Kerala on August 1, 2026, underscores the Centre’s role in augmenting state finances for capital expenditure. This tranche, part of a ₹1,09,019 crore advance distribution to states from net Union tax proceeds, highlights the mechanisms of fiscal federalism enshrined in the Constitution and the Finance Commission’s recommendations. The timing—just before the routine monthly devolution on August 10—demonstrates the Centre’s discretionary fiscal measures to address state-specific developmental needs.
Background
- The Constitution of India, under Article 270, mandates the distribution of net proceeds of Union taxes and duties between the Union and the states, with the Finance Commission determining the principles governing such devolution.
- The Finance Commission, a constitutional body constituted every five years, recommends the vertical and horizontal devolution of taxes, ensuring equity and fiscal autonomy among states.
- States utilise tax devolution primarily for revenue expenditure, but capital expenditure—critical for infrastructure and developmental projects—often faces funding gaps, necessitating additional central support.
- Kerala, a high-income state with significant developmental aspirations, frequently relies on central devolution to bridge fiscal deficits and accelerate capital spending in sectors like healthcare, education, and infrastructure.
- The Union government’s advance instalments of tax devolution are a tool to front-load fiscal transfers, enabling states to plan and execute capital projects without delays.
What is Tax Devolution under the Indian Constitution?
- Tax devolution refers to the constitutional mechanism under Article 270, wherein a fixed percentage of the Union’s net tax revenue is transferred to states.
- The Finance Commission, constituted under Article 280, determines the vertical devolution (share of states in Union taxes) and horizontal devolution (distribution among states), ensuring equity and efficiency.
- Tax devolution is a non-conditional transfer, providing states autonomy in utilising funds for their developmental priorities, unlike centrally sponsored schemes with earmarked expenditures.
- States utilise tax devolution for both revenue expenditure (e.g., salaries, pensions) and capital expenditure (e.g., infrastructure, public health), with the latter often requiring supplementary central support.
- The Union government may release additional instalments of tax devolution to address specific fiscal needs, such as capital spending, as seen in Kerala’s case, demonstrating flexibility within the fiscal framework.
- Tax devolution is distinct from grants-in-aid (Article 275), which are conditional and targeted at specific sectors or states with fiscal deficits.
- The distribution of tax devolution among states follows principles of equity, performance, and needs, with factors like population, income distance, and area influencing horizontal allocation.
UPSC Value Addition
Keywords for Mains Answer-Writing
Tax Devolution to States · Finance Commission · Union-State Financial Relations · Article 280 of the Constitution · Gross Tax Revenue · Net Proceeds of Union Taxes · Capital Expenditure by States · Devolution of Taxes Mechanism · Fiscal Federalism in India · Kerala State Finances · Union Finance Ministry · State Development Expenditure · Intergovernmental Fiscal Transfers · Constitutional Provisions on Tax Sharing
Prelims Practice Questions
Q1. Consider the following statements regarding tax devolution to States in India:
1. The Finance Commission determines the principles governing the distribution of net proceeds of Union taxes between the Union and the States.
2. The current percentage of taxes devolved to States is fixed at 41% of the gross tax revenue.
3. The Union Finance Ministry releases tax devolution instalments to States on a monthly basis.
4. Tax devolution is a constitutional obligation under Article 279 of the Constitution.
How many of the above statements are correct?
- Only one
- Only two
- Only three
- All four
Answer: Only three — Statements 1 and 3 are correct. Statement 2 is incorrect as the percentage is not fixed at 41%; it varies based on Finance Commission recommendations. Statement 4 is incorrect as tax devolution is governed by Article 280, not Article 279.
Q2. Assertion (A): The Union government releases tax devolution to States as part of the constitutional scheme of fiscal federalism.
Reason (R): The Finance Commission, a constitutional body, recommends the principles for the distribution of net proceeds of Union taxes between the Union and the States.
Options:
A. Both A and R are true, and R is the correct explanation of A.
B. Both A and R are true, but R is not the correct explanation of A.
C. A is true, but R is false.
D. A is false, but R is true.
Answer: ? — Both A and R are true. The Union government releases tax devolution as part of fiscal federalism, and the Finance Commission recommends the distribution principles under Article 280.
Q3. Match the following columns regarding the distribution of tax proceeds in India:
Column I (Constitutional Provision)
A. Article 279
B. Article 280
C. Article 281
D. Article 293
Column II (Subject)
1. Finance Commission
2. Taxes to be levied by the Union but collected and appropriated by the States
3. Recommendations of the Finance Commission
4. Borrowing by States
Options:
A. A-2, B-1, C-3, D-4
B. A-1, B-2, C-3, D-4
C. A-3, B-1, C-2, D-4
D. A-4, B-2, C-1, D-3
Answer: ? — Correct matches are: A-2 (Article 279 defines taxes levied by Union but collected by States), B-1 (Article 280 establishes the Finance Commission), C-3 (Article 281 deals with recommendations of the Finance Commission), D-4 (Article 293 pertains to borrowing by States).
Mains Practice Question
✍ The Union government’s decision to release an additional instalment of ₹2,597 crore to Kerala as part of tax devolution underscores the evolving dynamics of fiscal federalism in India. Critically examine the constitutional and institutional framework governing tax devolution to States, with particular reference to the role of the Finance Commission and the Union Finance Ministry. Also, analyse the implications of such additional instalments for State capital expenditure and fiscal autonomy. (15 Marks)
Approach: MODEL-ANSWER SKELETON:
1. **Constitutional Framework (3 marks)**
– Article 279: Definition of ‘net proceeds’ of Union taxes.
– Article 280: Establishment and functions of the Finance Commission (FC).
– Article 281: Recommendations of the FC on tax devolution and grants-in-aid.
– Article 282: Grants for public purposes (discretionary transfers).
– 15th FC recommendations (2021-26) on vertical and horizontal devolution (41% of gross tax revenue).
2. **Institutional Roles (4 marks)**
– Finance Commission: Determines principles for devolution, assesses States’ needs, and recommends grants.
– Union Finance Ministry: Executes devolution instalments, manages fiscal transfers, and ensures compliance with FC recommendations.
– State Finance Departments: Utilise devolved funds for capital and developmental expenditure.
– Example: Kerala’s receipt of ₹2,597 crore as an ‘advance instalment’ to boost capital spending.
3. **Additional Instalments and Capital Expenditure (4 marks)**
– Purpose: Address liquidity constraints, accelerate developmental projects, and reduce fiscal deficits.
– Mechanism: Advance instalments (e.g., ₹1,09,019 crore distributed on August 1, 2026) to States for urgent capital needs.
– Implications:
– Enhances State autonomy in expenditure planning.
– Reduces reliance on market borrowings for States.
– Potential for fiscal discipline concerns if overused.
4. **Fiscal Federalism and Challenges (4 marks)**
– **Strengths**:
– Reduces vertical imbalance between Union and States.
– Promotes equitable resource distribution (e.g., Kerala’s high per capita devolution due to FC criteria).
– **Challenges**:
– Delayed FC recommendations leading to ad-hoc transfers.
– Over-reliance on Union discretion in additional instalments.
– Fiscal imbalances between States (e.g., BIMARU vs. high-income States).
– **Way Forward**:
– Strengthen FC’s independence and timeliness.
– Institutionalise transparent criteria for additional instalments.
– Balance between fiscal autonomy and Union oversight.
Source: The Hindu
Generated by AanyaAi for educational purpose.
No Comments