14 Feb The Influence of Indian Culture in Southeast Asian countries during prehistoric period
The Influence of Indian Culture on Southeast Asian Countries
The Influence of Indian Culture in Southeast Asian countries during the prehistoric period: An Analysis in a special context of recent discoveries.
India has never been an isolated country. Harappan Culture/ Civilization had a commercial relationship with Mesopotamia and Egyptian countries and in the later period, the cultural elements of India diffused towards southeast Asian countries. Many ancient texts like Ramayan, and Pali Nideshak described the Suvarnadwipa which means the island of the gold, Suvarnabhumi, the land of the gold Harpur dip (land of the camphor). Southeast Asian countries are rich in the production of coconut (Narikela Dvipa). In Ramayan, Rama visited Lanka which was made/constructed of Gold. Many Chinese sources also describe the presence of the Brahmans in these regions. After the origin of Buddhism in India, It diffused in the entire world, mainly to Southeast Asian countries. During the period of the Chola, they conquered southeast Asian countries. The Indianistain of Southeast Asian culture was the result of trade and commerce.
Many southeast Asian countries are following the practices of their ancient period. However, they had adopted any other religion but they have not left their cultural values. This shows the depth of Indian culture in Southeast Asian countries.
The gradual diffusion of Indian Culture toward Southeast Asian countries
During the prehistoric period, we see the cultural similarity between the eastern Indian culture with the cultures of Burma, China, Tibet, etc. If we study the potteries of the prehistoric period, we see the similarity in the ceramic cultures of both of the regions.
There is much evidence collected during the 19th century from eastern Indian sites regarding the cultural migration and influence from Northern India towards northeast and eastern India. The records however are kept in London. Robert Bruce Foote found many pieces of evidence from Pallavaram, Madras, and Boucher de Perthes (France) in 1863. Still, there are many places where archaeological excavation could not be done properly. The Neolithic people of eastern India might have migrated to the southeast Asian region and could carry the cultural features there.
Beginning with the pioneering work of Sir John Lubbock (1867) who reported for the first time the evidence of the prehistoric archaeological record from Northeast India in the Athenaeum of London in 1867. The credit should be given to British anthropologists and archaeologists who contributed to archaeological research before the independence of India. During pre-Independence India many discoveries were made by Robert Bruice fruit regarding the pre-historical sites. He was the person whose contribution towards the paleolithic sites in India is unparalleled. However, after the Independence of India, many archaeologists like HC Sharma also analyzed the significance of Robert Bruce fruit’s work. On the bases of neolithic sites, HC Sharma successfully explained the migration of people from one place to another place in the search for a subsistence base.
There are many historic sites discovered by archeologists explaining their cultural significance. HC Sharma in his arctic published in 2003 shows that the research is confined to basically surface sites and rarely excavated sites of the Neolithic cultural period. J.P. Mills in the 1930s also stated that “the spade, the chief tool of archaeologists had hardly been used in research in Assam” The surface finds and excavated material failed to provide a detailed understanding of the subsistence and settlement patterns of the early farming communities.
This part of India still suffers from insufficient data for reconstructing its past cultures though it has a long history of more than 140 years of archaeological research.
However, we have very rich archaeological sites explaining the evidence of the cultural flow but because of a lack of sufficient discoveries and the excavation, the picture is still to uncover. However, based on the literary sources it can be mentioned that the migration of the people could be there. Migration of humans has been the general characteristic during the prehistoric era because humans had to migrate from one place to another place in the search of new subsistence bases. Based on archaeological and anthropological studies, this migration can be predicted. During the Paleolithic phase, many African men migrated toward India and from India to Southeast Asian countries. They must have carried some cultural element with them to various parts of Eurasia.
The academic discussions among the Lower Palaeolithic archaeologists are centered on the debate about the timing and geographic expansion of the earliest “Out of Africa” hominid migrations. In recent years, the “Out of Africa” model has been playing a vital role in the Old World Palaeolithic scenario, which implies that Homo erectus ventured outside the African continent at 1.8 million years or slightly before.
Nearly four decades of intermittent prehistoric investigations (initiated in the mid-1970s) in the Garo Hills of Meghalaya revealed the existence of several assemblages with Paleolithic elements. The artifacts which have been identified (or rather, claimed) to be of Lower, Middle, and Upper Palaeolithic traditions of European nomenclature were collected from secondary depositional contexts and have been placed in different cultural stages based on the typological ground. Some of the industries have been compared and correlated to Indian as well as Southeast Asian traditions. As these artifacts are mostly surface collections and the chronology is not yet well understood, the issue of the presence of Palaeolithic artifacts remains a “dilemma” in the prehistory of Northeast India (Hazarika 2012).
Chinese Culture and Indian Culture
In the recent research done by Chinese scholars, the evidence of the cultural flow can be predicted. Recently in 2006, the archaeologists of China Londo, Chiang, Hung, Chiang, and Barbara analyzed the culture based on the DNA study. He studied the DNA sequencing of three distinct gene regions in a phylogeographic approach to investigate the domestication of cultivated rice. Finally, he concluded about the cultural relationship between India and China, mainly Indo-Chinese regions of southeast Asia. Indochina may represent the ancestral center of diversity for the wild rice Oryza Rufipogon.
Phylogeographic analysis suggests that cultivated rice, Oryza sativa, was domesticated from its wild progenitor, Oryza Rufipogon, at least twice in at least two different geographic regions in eastern Asia and that the products of these two independent domestication events are the two major rice varieties, Oryza sativa indica and Oryza sativa japonica. Based on this geographical analysis, Oryza sativa indica was domesticated within a region south of the Himalayan mountain range, most likely in eastern India, Myanmar, and Thailand, while Oryza sativa japonica was domesticated from wild rice in southern China.
Culture of Northeast region
T.C. Sharma (1991) has pointed out that scholars all over the world think that archaeology in Northeast India is very important for world archaeology because this region is supposed to have played a great role in the domestication of several food plants essential for man, including rice. Therefore, It may be proved that during the prehistoric period, there must have been an interconnectivity between Indian culture with the culture of the Southeast Asian region,
Indian Culture and Southern Asian Country
In the Historic Period, we have clear evidence available showing the cultural interrelation between India and Southeast Asian countries. The evolution of Buddhism and the diffusion of Buddhism towards southeast Asian countries may be the one reason behind that cultural connection to southeast Asian countries. Besides, many traders and merchants During the Asokan period, Many messengers and representatives of the Asoka were sent to various regions of the world and they not only reached there but some of them settled there and in this way, they brought the Indian culture with themself.
Cultural flow from southern India towards the southeast Asian countries did not start only in the historical period because of commercial relationships or political relationships but this migration had been continuing from India towards the southeast Asian countries for thousands of years.
General migration of the Human can be seen in the direction of the rivers flow because for the men migration in the direction of rivers flow was easy. In the lack of technology, humans could not migrate against the river’s flow. And hence the cultural migration from northern India towards southern India and then southeast Asian countries should not be surprising Burma (Myanmar), Thailand, Việt Nam, Cambodia, and Laos, Malay World is the region where the cultural connections with India are found in a large scale. The numerous reason behind the cultural influence on these regions can be described.
Daily Current Affairs for UPSC
PLUTUS IAS CURRENT AFFAIRS 14th FEB 2023
The topics Described described above talk about Indian Culture and History which are related to Daily Current Affairs. Get such kind of the latest and best daily current affairs on Indian History, Culture, and Geography for the UPSC examination free of cost. Also, read weekly, and monthly current affairs today for IAS exam preparation.